Skip to main content

Making Decisions

Decision points are the heart of crisis simulations, where you apply crisis management principles to realistic scenarios.

Understanding Decision Points

What Makes a Good Decision?

In crisis simulations, decisions are evaluated on:

Effectiveness

Does it address the problem?

Stakeholder Impact

How does it affect all parties?

Risk Management

Balance of risk vs reward

Resource Efficiency

Appropriate use of assets

Timeliness

Made quickly enough?

Communication

Proper stakeholder notification

Decision-Making Framework

OODA Loop

Observe → Orient → Decide → Act
1

Observe

Gather information about the current situation
2

Orient

Analyze what the information means in context
3

Decide

Choose the best course of action
4

Act

Commit to your decision and see the outcome

DECIDE Model

A comprehensive crisis decision framework:
  • Define the problem
  • Establish criteria for solutions
  • Consider alternatives
  • Identify the best alternative
  • Develop and implement action plan
  • Evaluate and monitor results

Decision Types

High-Level Direction
  • Overall crisis response strategy
  • Resource allocation priorities
  • Long-term vs short-term trade-offs
  • Organizational positioning
Example: Evacuate facility or shelter in place?

Common Decision Scenarios

Time-Pressured Decisions

Challenge: Must decide quickly with incomplete information Strategy:
Use 80/20 rule - good enough beats perfect too late
Apply standard protocols when available
Trust training and instinct
Accept that some uncertainty is unavoidable

Information-Poor Decisions

Challenge: Critical information is missing Strategy:
Identify what you know vs what you don’t
Make reasonable assumptions, state them clearly
Choose option robust to multiple scenarios
Plan to adjust as more info emerges

High-Stakes Decisions

Challenge: Significant consequences either way Strategy:
Systematically evaluate each option
Consider worst-case scenarios
Consult available resources/procedures
Balance risk aversion with decisive action

Ethical Dilemmas

Challenge: Options involve competing values Strategy:
Identify the ethical principles in conflict
Consider stakeholder perspectives
Apply organizational values
Document reasoning for transparency

Decision-Making Best Practices

Don’t select the first reasonable option. Review all choices to ensure you’re picking the best, not just an acceptable one.
Think beyond immediate outcomes. What happens next? And after that?
Who’s affected? Employees, customers, regulators, public, shareholders?
Check if emergency plans, procedures, or data can inform your decision.
Some decisions need immediate action; others benefit from deliberation. Know which is which.
Note why you chose as you did. Helps with learning and real-world accountability.
Once decided, implement decisively. Hesitant execution undermines good decisions.

Team Decision-Making

Collaborative Decisions

In group simulations, some decisions require team input:
1

Share Information

Each team member contributes relevant knowledge
2

Discuss Options

Debate pros/cons of choices
3

Build Consensus

Try to align on best option
4

Decide

Vote, reach consensus, or leader decides based on input
5

Support Decision

Once made, team supports it even if it wasn’t their preference

Avoiding Groupthink

Groupthink Risks:
  • Pressure to conform
  • Dismissing alternative views
  • Illusion of unanimity
  • Self-censorship
Countermeasures:
Encourage devil’s advocate role
Seek diverse perspectives
Question assumptions
Consider external viewpoints

Learning from Decisions

After Each Decision

Understand the Outcome
  • What happened because of your choice?
  • Why did it score as it did?
  • What were the consequences?

Decision Pitfalls to Avoid

Analysis Paralysis

Pitfall: Overthinking to the point of inactionSolution: Set decision deadlines, use “good enough” standard

Confirmation Bias

Pitfall: Only seeing information that supports your preferred optionSolution: Actively seek disconfirming evidence

Recency Bias

Pitfall: Overweighting the most recent informationSolution: Review all available information, not just latest

Anchoring

Pitfall: Fixating on initial informationSolution: Reassess as new data emerges

Sunk Cost Fallacy

Pitfall: Continuing bad approach because of past investmentSolution: Evaluate based on future, not past

Overconfidence

Pitfall: Too certain despite limited informationSolution: Acknowledge uncertainty, plan contingencies

Next Steps